Crowdjustice appeal for court case to allow Ombudsman complaints over council bullying of families with disabled youngsters

We (Zoe and Philip) are a Mum and son team who’ve been around the block a few times in terms of fighting our corner to get Philip the health, education and social care provision he is entitled to as an autistic young person. We have both written blogs for SNJ in the past – mostly about our use of Relationship Development Intervention (RDI) both in our family and at Bright Futures School.

CrowdJustice appeal

We have recently set up a CrowdJustice appeal asking for help get our case to Supreme Court to protect young people with additional needs and their families from being bullied and/or mistreated by their local authorities. If the appeal succeeds, it would bring this kind of treatment within the scope of the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman. This sounds technical and obscure, but it could make a huge difference to families across the country.

What’s the case about?

We started this case in 2019. The wheels of justice turn incredibly slowly ☹

Our local authority treated us both really badly during an appeal to SEND First Tier Tribunal that we had to bring to secure Philip the appropriate post-19 education. We won the Tribunal appeal (huzzah!) and his educational package was fully funded. But we were appalled at how our LA treated us at different points during the case. This included not seeking Philip’s views while claiming to have done so, then ignoring his views when they did get them. They made scurrilous and unfounded accusations against me and they also moved the goalposts in relation to interim agreements they made.

We were aware of lots of other families who had been treated in a similar way by their local authorities and were sick of seeing families’ rights being trampled over by those whose job it was to support them.

To us, it made sense that our appalling treatment by the local authority was not something that would be dealt with by the SEN Tribunal, as the Tribunal is designed to look at particular parts of an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) and decide what education the child or young person needs. So, we took our case to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGSCO) who we believed had jurisdiction to deal with our complaint and would support us in ensuring that local authorities would not be able to continue with this kind of behaviour.

However, the LGSCO said most of our complaint was outside their jurisdiction, meaning there was no deterrent to local authorities continuing to behave in this way and no remedy for parents who had been mistreated.

Action against the Ombudsman

Using legal aid (thank goodness for this), we then brought a judicial review action against the LGSCO in the High Court. We succeeded in the High Court on one point, that the local authority had made numerous claims about obtaining Philip’s wishes and feelings when they had not. As a result, the Ombudsman will have to reconsider whether to investigate our complaint about this specific issue.

However, we were unsuccessful in our claim that the Ombudsman could consider the LA’s behaviour during and around tribunal proceedings. We went to the Court of Appeal because we didn’t agree that the Tribunal could provide a remedy. It is our view the Ombudsman was the only available way to challenge the council’s behaviour. We were again unsuccessful (sometimes, the law is an ass…….) leaving us with no legal remedy for our mistreatment.

Our last chance to change the law – we need your help!

Our legal team consists of solicitors at the top of their game from Irwin Mitchell as well as barristers who have appeared in many reported cases including leading Supreme Court cases on disability issues. They firmly believe we have a good case.

We are seeking crowdfunding of £15,000 to enable our legal team to request permission to appeal to the Supreme Court. If permission is granted, we will then submit another application for legal aid to fund the costs relating to the case being heard in the Supreme Court.

Should local authorities be able to get away with disrespecting, bullying, ignoring or maligning young people with additional needs and their families? Our goal, in a nutshell, is to ensure that if this happens, families have a remedy available to them to challenge the mistreatment via the LGSCO. If the Supreme Court doesn’t consider our case, the law will remain that the Ombudsman is not able to investigate any mistreatment relating to tribunal proceedings. The SEND Tribunal can only give remedies in very limited circumstances, therefore as the law stands this behaviour will only be investigated (and remedied) very rarely.

We can’t get to the Supreme Court without your help – please contribute and share this link with your families and friends and ask them to contribute.

If we are granted permission to appeal by the Supreme Court and then win the appeal, SEND families who have been mistreated by their local authorities will finally be able to challenge any mistreatment if it arises around a Tribunal appeal. We think this will have huge impact for families’ rights, and also the way local authorities behave to our families.

Thanks for your help!

Also read:

Don’t miss a thing!

Don’t miss any posts from SNJ - simply add your email address below. You must click the link in the confirmation email you’ll receive to activate your free subscription.

You can also keep up with us by following our WhatsApp Channel!

Want more? Be an SNJ Patron!

SNJ is a non-profit company and everyone who writes here does so voluntarily. We need your support to help us with costs by donating once or as a regular patron. Regular donors get an exclusive SEND update newsletter as thanks! Find out more here

Zoe Thompson
Follow me

We LOVE to hear what you think... please take a minute to add your views here, so your comment is seen by all!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

s2Member®
Close