Edward Timpson and Jane Ellison: “Our reforms are boosting the life chances of children with SEND”

As parent carers we often measure our successes in the little victories we achieve on a day to day basis. They may not seem significant to some, but to us they are milestones that serve to remind us that as a result of our hard work, we are taking steps forwards, however small those steps may be.

The post I am going to share with you today is one of those landmark moments that could pass you by unnoticed if no one tapped you on the shoulder and pointed it out. It actually marks a very important milestone that has been many years and many meetings in the making.

Tania Tirraoro and Edward TimpsonAs any regular readers of Special Needs Jungle will know, Tania and Edward Timpson have seen rather a lot of each other over the years. During this time Tania has challenged, supported, advised, scolded and collaborated with the Department for Education in order to make sure that the views of parent carers, children and young people are not lost from the decision making process. More recently we have been trying to engage with Health in the same way and were delighted to meet with Jane Ellison in March of this year. During that meeting we spoke about the importance of Health and Education working together, as in the real worlJane Ellisond our children's health needs do not stop when they walk into school and their educational needs are directly affected by their health conditions. We even went as far as suggesting that Edward Timpson and Jane Ellison might want to think about getting together sometime and having a talk about it, after all, it might just be mutually beneficial.

So imagine my delight when Tania broke the news that 1. The Department for Education had approached her asking if she would publish a blog post for them and 2. The blog post was being written collaboratively by Edward Timpson and Jane Ellison.

This, my friends, is a milestone that should be recognised. I want to believe that Jane Ellison is acting directly on the advice we gave her. That she took on board that parent carers want to see Health and Education starting to work and communicate collaboratively on issues around the SEND Reforms. We might even allow ourselves to believe that we are witnessing the Ministers in Health and Education beginning to recognise that in order to deliver joined up services for disabled children, they need to understand how their own services directly influence the ability of the other services to work effectively. Now we just need to invite Social Care to the party!

And so without further ado, here is what Edward Timpson and Jane Ellison want to tell you about the SEND reforms...

[Be sure to leave your comments below rather than on social media if you want to give the Ministers your feedback.]

 


Edward Timpson and Jane Ellison Quote

 

Every parent wants to see their child happy, confident, doing well at school and on track to becoming a successful, secure adult. They desire academic success, rewarding careers, and place value on loyal friendships and time to pursue hobbies.

At the heart of every parent’s dream for their child is the ambition that they have the same life chances as any other, regardless of the individual challenges they face or the obstacles they must overcome.

As lead ministers for children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND), our ambition is just that. Our vision is that these children have dreams as big as any other young person, and aspirations that are just as high. That’s why we’ve made fundamental changes to the way the SEND support system works for families, the biggest in a generation, placing them at the heart of the process and working hard to ensure their views are taken into account throughout.

In the past few months, we have both sat down separately with parents like you to find out what’s working, and what isn’t. We have discussed the challenges of implementing the new framework for SEND across education, social care and health and the daily challenges you face supporting a child with special educational needs or a disability.

We know there is still a long way to go to deliver a system that works smoothly, in the coordinated way it is intended, but your insight and experiences are invaluable in helping us achieve this. Meeting with families like you ensures that our work remains focused and we want to continue these regular meetings.

But we should all be proud of what has been achieved over the last few years and we are both heartened by the support we have received from everyone involved.

Moreover, we are getting hugely encouraging feedback from parents of children with SEND who say the new system is making a real and lasting difference to them. A few weeks ago, we published a report which investigated the experiences of some of the families going through the process of getting an Education Health and Care (EHC) plan. They told us that they like many of the principles in the reforms and overall are satisfied with the new approach. They also highlighted areas needing improvement, and their personal stories have been a valuable tool for councils to improve the service they provide. It’s also vital that we strike the right balance between timing of assessment and quality of the finished plan, something we know varies considerably across the country.

This kind of feedback is vital to give us a richer understanding of where we, and all other agencies involved in this radical system change, need to work harder.

And today we have published new figures which will help direct this work. Data collection like this is an essential part of assessing progress. This, together with the work of our team of SEND advisers and findings from the new Ofsted and CQC local area SEND inspections, will help target the support and challenge we give to councils.

We are already seeing many examples of great practice, delivered with real enthusiasm – such as in York, where the importance they place on good communication is supporting families through the system in a sympathetic way, and has seen more than 90% of new plans completed within 20 weeks.

The data put out today shows some really positive stories emerging. For the first time, we have collected and published the rate of recruitment of Designated Clinical Officers (DCO), who act as a key link between health professionals and other partners. It’s great to see that 147 council areas (97%) now have these in place. Indeed, we are seeing fantastic progress in some areas, such as in Kingston & Richmond’s SEND Family Voices scheme, where parent-carers are involved in key decision-making and support Kingston Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) in commissioning its community paediatrics services.

A fundamental part of the reforms was to ensure that where required, young people have the same legal protections all the way through to age 25 – and today’s data bears out this fundamental point: 19 to 25-year-olds who need that extra bit of time in education are now receiving EHC plans, and are being supported all the way to adulthood.

Throughout this process it’s been clear, through our meetings with families like you, that the people involved truly want these reforms to work - but we know this is a steep learning curve. Councils are still learning new ways of working, and these will become routine in time.

Our network of Independent Supporters, into which we are investing £45 million between 2014 and 2017, are proving to be a catalyst for this change – they are helping embed the reforms, creating positive, powerful relationships with families, like you, who are accessing support. It’s encouraging to see the impact these individuals are having on children and young people with SEND - the very people who are at the heart of our work.

The job is not yet done – but there are clear signs that we are on track. We know what we have to do to keep things moving forward. The progress that has been made is thanks to the enormous dedication of all involved, and the candid insight you provide to continually challenge us.

Today, 74,000 children and young people with SEND are in possession of an EHC plan – a vital step in boosting their life chances. We can all be rightly proud of how far we’ve come. And in doing so we must remain resolute in our drive and determination to see the new SEND system, whether in education, heath or social care, become a springboard to a successful and happy life.

Edward Timpson DfE SEND Reforms

 

Edward Timpson, Minister of State for Children and Families

 

 

 

Jane Ellison Dept of Health SEND reforms

 

Jane Ellison, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Public Health

 


 

So do you agree with the Ministers' views on the SEND Reforms, or do you think they need a reality check? Make sure you take the time to share your views and experiences in the comments below!

Renata Blower
Follow me

23
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
13 Comment authors
Tris kayeMrs.D.A.Lynch LynchAUNYorksKatherine CoreyMelanie Hardcastle Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Twinsplustwo
Guest
Twinsplustwo

Unfortunately whilst I appreciate the child focussed strength of the new system, and that the EHCP is a less static, more time relevant document, it’s hugely over-optimistic to call it an Education, HEALTH and Care Plan because there is no statutory requirement for Health to be involved, at least in the writing of the document. My second son has complex needs and multiple diagnoses, he sees (currently) 6 consultants and yet NOT ONE provided a report for the Transfer Review. This is partly because they are too busy, some are not permitted to leave their workplace (physio and community paeds)… Read more »

Twinsplustwo
Guest
Twinsplustwo

Unfortunately whilst I appreciate the child focussed strength of the new system, and that the EHCP is a less static, more time relevant document, it’s hugely over-optimistic to call it an Education, HEALTH and Care Plan because there is no statutory requirement for Health to be involved, at least in the writing of the document. My second son has complex needs and multiple diagnoses, he sees (currently) 6 consultants and yet NOT ONE provided a report for the Transfer Review. This is partly because they are too busy, some are not permitted to leave their workplace (physio and community paeds)… Read more »

Heather payne
Guest
Heather payne

My son has got dysprexia and sensory disorder he is due to start secondary school in September and he wanted to go to a school that is 6 miles away from home not the school that is 2 miles away because the kids that have been bullying him at primary school are going there and because of this wiltshire council are refusing to transport him there even know he’s intitled to it even know they have 3 reports from different professionals stating that he can not get himself there as it wouldn’t be safe to let him get a bus… Read more »

deannelodge
Member
deannelodge

Ed and Jane..I hope you don’t mind me being on first name terms with you…if it shows lack of respect I offer no apology because the lack of respect my daughter, my husband and I have been exposed to is beyond reprehensible, and all because of your new reforms – that were rushed through – and because LA’s are not being held accountable. The only way to fight this unjust, messed up system is to spend money – that, by the way, families with SEND children don’t usually have an abundance of because usually one of the parents has to… Read more »

Annette Edmondson
Guest
Annette Edmondson

What a complete joke. I am on my local PCF steering group and hear first hand the utter hell that many families are being put through on a daily basis trying to fight to get what their children are legally entitled to. Sorry Ed and Jane, your reforms are a disgrace. They are not improving anything whatsoever, and while budgets continue to be given more importance than children’s needs, they never will. My own son has multiple diagnoses: ASD, PDA, Tourettes, Dyslexia, Sensory Processing Disorder, and has self-harmed at school, but because he has made a tiny bit of progress… Read more »

Eliza Doolittle
Guest
Eliza Doolittle

Mr Timpson: are you aware of the fact that local authorities missed the deadline this year for transferring to EHC Plans for over 4000 children? That’s 4000 children due to transfer to new phases of education who are left in limbo not knowing what school they are moving to, and unable to exercise their rights of appeal in relation to EHC Plans the standard of which is in the main, frankly, appalling. Are you aware that councils are regularly ignoring fundamental requirements for new EHC needs assessments when children transfer to EHC Plans? Are you aware that the requirement that… Read more »

elizabeth72
Member
elizabeth72

I couldn’t agree more heartily!!! ?

Carrie
Guest
Carrie

“A fundamental part of the reforms was to ensure that where required, young people have the same legal protections all the way through to age 25 – and today’s data bears out this fundamental point: 19 to 25-year-olds who need that extra bit of time in education are now receiving EHC plans, and are being supported all the way to adulthood.” Sorry Ed and Jane. I am just not seeing it. You need to be able to explain to my 18 year old daughter how it is that, having had a LA that has strategically obstructed her wish to continue… Read more »

elizabeth72
Member
elizabeth72

Frankly I admire Ed & Jane’s positive spin but in my view that is all it is! I have seen very little by way of our ‘NEW IMPROVED DELIVERY SYSTEM’. Far too many ‘Parents & Professional’s’ are struggling to access or meet the need’s of ‘FAR TOO MANY VULNERABLE CHILDREN’! As for ‘TIMELY’. Is this a joke!? We live within EAST SUSSEX (Piloting county) our experience has been far from favourable or timely! (2 academic years of pressing for further assessments and statement prior to school’s agreement to apply for EHC assessment made in Jan 15. 41 weeks from application… Read more »

bumfluff
Member
bumfluff

Mr Timpson – My county is cambridgeshire, and as far as I’m concerned the reforms have made things worse. My son was on school action plus prior to being diagnosed with adhd and auditory processing disorder, dyslexia and dyspraxia in the summer of 2014. As the reforms were changing we applied for an assessment, were turned down so we appealed. We’ve spent about 18 k of our own money to go to tribunal and get expert reports, only to be faced with a solicitors firm used by the LA that are well known outside of the county for their tactics… Read more »

Carrie
Guest
Carrie

Yes, I share your concerns. My county uses the same firm of solicitor as Cambridgeshire. The really scary part is that the firm in question provides training to professionals in this area, arranged via the LA package. It would make me laugh if it were not so serious: A power point training presentation is available online which reveals professionals are told it is their role to support the LA in SEN tribunal appeals. And there I was thinking that the duty of care was owed directly to the child/young person. Scary.

Katherine Corey
Guest
Katherine Corey

Interesting to read that they (the Minsters) consider FE as; ‘19 to 25-year-olds who need that extra bit of time in education’. I believe that post-19 education offers a young person the opportunity to reinvent themselves as an adult at college; provides personalised learning, progression of skills and preparing the young people for the next stage of the journey into adulthood whether that is further study, employment and /or supported living.
Katherine Corey, Royal College Manchester @ The Seashell Trust

Carrie
Guest
Carrie

I think you have hit the nail on the head. Young people will never be able to move on until LA’s recognise that their role is to assess needs and to draw up EHCP’s that promote independence into adulthood. it should go without saying, but it doesn’t.

Yossarian
Member
Yossarian

“Throughout this process it’s been clear, through our meetings with families like you, that the people involved truly want these reforms to work – but we know this is a steep learning curve. ” Ok – weird sentence. Not sure quite who “the people involved” are – if parents then this is a fatuous statement. If professionals, then can’t agree. Can you explain why parents win over 80% of all appeals to tribunal? Isn’t this fact by itself enough to have you jumping out of your chair to DO SOMETHING? Doesn’t it also indicate that the fundamental problems that were… Read more »

Mrs.D.A.Lynch Lynch
Guest
Mrs.D.A.Lynch Lynch

Role: Parent/Carer LA: Derbyshire We are the parents of three adopted children who all have SEND’s. We were in tribunal with our eldest daughters statement that had not been reviewed for four years. Her school suddenly decided they could not meet her needs on 3/215. We eventually after postponements and numerous spinning of the law by the LA’s representative got to the tribunal court Auguat 19th 2015. At the tribunal the LA conceeded after just 45 minutes. We applied for EHCP’s for our other two children too in February 2015 and were turned down. We then appealed and they agreed… Read more »

Tristan
Member
Tristan

I think Ed And Jane need to sit in or review some of the parent meetings that take place with the
LA ‘s. They are out of touch, ill informed and franckly clueless as to what is going on out there. WAKE UP AND DO YOUR JOB.
Parent of a child with ASD. Fighting the LA to do their job properly for a second time in three years. Disgraceful.