with Dennis Simms, IntegratED Hub Lead
The SEND Review Green Paper places great emphasis on including alternative provision within a "single system" with mainstream and special schools. The DfE want to create a more stable funding stream for AP to improve quality provision, rather than having money move with the child as they enter and leave an AP, possibly after just a few terms.
But funding isn't the only issue with AP quality. The IntegratED partnership, which aims to reduce preventable school exclusions and improve the education for excluded children, identifies "vast inconsistencies in quality across the sector and some AP pupils do not receive the high-quality education and support they require and deserve." What is best practice, and indeed, what can mainstream schools learn?
IntegratED has created a new holistic AP Quality Toolkit, to facilitate greater collaboration and a shared consensus of what good quality AP looks like. But when you read it, it looks to us like something that every educator should read, wherever they work because what's good for children in AP, is good for every child - and who knows, if every school took it up, it may result in fewer children needing Alternative Provision to start off with.
Dennis Simms is a former AP headteacher and the IntegratED Hub Lead at the Centre for Social Justice. He's written for us about the toolkit and we hope you'll share it as widely as possible.
Why our AP Quality Toolkit can transform practice, by Dennis Sims, IntegratED
Every year thousands of pupils find themselves in alternative provision (AP). In 2021, there were at least 32,083 pupils educated across at least 761 alternative provision settings and yet alternative provision continues to be a part of the education system that most know little about.
AP supports and educates pupils who have been excluded from school, are at risk of exclusion or who, for another reason, require an alternative form of education. These pupils include those with social, emotional and mental health needs (SEMH) and those who have encountered adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) that have impacted their ability to succeed in mainstream school environments.
Pupils in AP are amongst those with the highest levels of need and most significant vulnerabilities in the country. 81% of pupils in alternative provision (AP) are on the SEND (special educational needs and disability) register, which is almost six times more than in mainstream schools. Almost half (47%) of pupils in AP are eligible for free school meals (FSM) compared to 13.6% of their mainstream peers. The significant scale and extent of pupils’ needs in the AP sector has also been compounded by disruption to learning and support caused by the coronavirus pandemic.
In alternative provision settings across the country, there is some fantastic work being done. But there are also vast inconsistencies in AP practice and performance and several cold spots, where pupils have a poor-to-zero chance of receiving a quality education. There are also significant data and evidence gaps that impede efforts to truly understand current practice and make meaningful and sustainable system improvement.
The uniqueness of Alternative Provision
When discussing alternative provision, it's important to understand the uniqueness of the AP sector and how schools and providers operate. AP schools and providers often perform different functions and roles within local education ecosystems. For example, many offer long term placements, others focus on short term placements designed to prepare pupils to return to mainstream education, and some provide outreach services to mainstream schools to help pupils stay in school. Most AP settings fulfil a combination of functions and adapt their provision to needs as they arise in their area.
When pupils start and leave AP is also unique. Typically, pupils do not start in year 7 and finish their studies in year 11. Instead, pupils can move into AP settings at any age and at any point in the year. Similarly, some pupils move back out of AP before the end of year 11, often transitioning back to mainstream schools or to specialist settings. AP schools and providers also have differing budgets, unstable funding and variances in local support services available to them.
The complexity of pupil need, combined with the nuanced way in which AP schools and providers operate, means the traditional frameworks and barometers used to evaluate quality and measure success in mainstream education are insufficient.
The SEND and AP Review stated, ‘The information we currently publish in ‘Compare School and College Performance’ does not include alternative provision schools and existing measures of performance do not account for the progress which can be made in a short time by this fluid cohort or the success of providers in reintegrating the children and young people back into mainstream schools.’
What does good quality AP look like?
At the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) and IntegratED, we have been involved in AP research since 2018. Two years ago, as part of the IntegratED programme, we set out on a mission to answer the question: ‘What are the characteristics of good quality alternative provision?
During this project, we worked extensively with the AP sector and explored a variety of approaches to evaluating and improving AP quality. We sought out examples of good practice and ran pilots in five areas of the country (Blackpool, Tameside, Sheffield, Gloucestershire and Plymouth).
Our findings and recommendations have been recently published in the form of the AP Quality Toolkit. This report represents the most viable and comprehensive approach ever developed to evaluate and improve AP quality.
About the AP Quality Toolkit
The foreword is co-signed by Mark Vickers MBE, Cath Kitchen OBE, Robert Gasson, Sarah Johnson, Tim Morfin, and Janice Cahill OBE. Our evidence-based approach has been endorsed by over 100 organisations/individuals working in and around the AP sector, including 10 Multi-Academy Trusts, 11 local councils, and 47 AP settings.
The toolkit identifies 13 quality areas, separated into three categories of community, curriculum and currency. They include all the important aspects of AP that impact pupils’ experience, education, and outcomes. You can read the detail in the Toolkit.
- Community
- Workforce development and wellbeing
- Home and family engagement
- Partnership working:
- Local authority
- Mainstream schools
- External alternative providers
- Other agencies
- Research and innovation
- Curriculum
- Pupil induction
- Attendance and engagement
- Supporting pupils’ needs:
- Literacy
- Special educational needs and disability (SEND)
- Health and wellbeing
- Quality of education
- Currency
- Personal development
- Qualifications
- Assessment of need
- Appropriate transition:
- Mainstream school
- Other Alternative Provision
- Specialist provision
- Post-16 destinations
The recommendation of ‘Implementing the AP Quality Toolkit’ is aimed at the DfE, Ofsted, local authorities, AP schools and providers, commissioners of AP and mainstream schools that have in-school AP.
What will implementing the AP Quality Toolkit achieve?
The toolkit provides a comprehensive framework, shared understanding and common vocabulary for AP quality at national, local and individual levels. We believe that the AP Quality Toolkit has the power to transform the way AP quality is understood, evaluated and improved and should be adopted by all stakeholders.
Through the implementation of the AP Quality Toolkit, policymakers, local authorities and AP leaders can work based on a shared consensus of the characteristics of good quality AP and can develop strategies which lead to genuine and sustainable improvements for pupils.
About Dennis
Dennis Simms is a former alternative provision headteacher from the East Midlands. He is the IntegratED Hub Lead at the Centre for Social Justice, Chief Executive Officer of Simms Coaching and Consultancy and Co-chair of Heads Forward (a network which supports circa 100 Headteachers to work collaboratively, share best practice and find solutions).
Also read:
- The SEND Review was published on Tuesday 29th March 2022. The consultation closed on July 22nd
- There is a dedicated website with alternative versions, languages and formats here
- The Green Paper is a DISCUSSION document, split into six chapters, with 22 consultation questions.
- See a list of all SNJ's posts on the SEND Review, including our analysis articles.
- Alternative versions of the consultation document: Large print PDF version | Order a copy | Easy read version | British Sign Language (BSL) version | Guide for children and young people
- Can you help support our work?
- #SENDReview: A vision for Alternative Provision, but where’s the evidence?
- #SENDReview Chapter 2 under the microscope: National standards, EHCP changes, and limiting choice
- #SENDReview: What is excellent SEND provision from early years to adulthood?
- #SENDReview: Defining Alternative Provision and… how about an apology?
Join the SNJ “Patron” Squad & get exclusive content!
Become a Patron!
- The SNJ Patrons' EXCLUSIVE SEND update Newsletter is OUT NOW! If you're a patron and you haven't received it check your spam. No joy? Get in touch.
Don’t miss a thing!
Are you signed up to SNJ new post alerts but aren’t seeing them in your inbox? There may be a couple of reasons for this. Check out why and how to fix it here
- SNJ in Conversation: SEND law in 2023. Public law barrister, Steve Broach, answers your questions - March 13, 2023
- LIVE WEBINAR: Will the Government’s “SEND Improvement Plan” fix SEND? Register here! - March 7, 2023
- Review: Why building a nurturing environment is vital for supporting autistic young people (Book Giveaway) - March 1, 2023
You must log in to post a comment.