Scrapping the SEND Tribunal would cover up injustice and no parent of a disabled child will ever support it

with Jane Harris, SEND parent and CEO of Speech and Language UK

SNJ Intro:

Last week we were dismayed and angry at the publication of a local-government-funded report into SEND, which claimed disabled children were an “existential threat” to councils. It recommended junking the SEND Tribunal and along with it, disabled children’s rights and accountability in an area where accountability is already thin on the ground. Whatever good ideas may have been in the report have, for us, been completely overshadowed, as public law barrister, Steve Broach KC said:

We were even more appalled at the uncritical reporting in some of the press, especially the Guardian whose reporter had clearly just read the report’s press release and really should know better. But most of all, we were very depressed over the lacklustre response from some organisations that purport to support disabled children and are funded royally by the government to do so. All our team spent the weekend feeling dejected and sick to our stomachs.

However, there were some charities that support disabled children who spoke out strongly, notably Imogen Steele at Contact. Jane Harris, the CEO of another charity, Speech and Language UK, has penned a guest article about their reaction to the report.

Buy SNJ Ad
SNJ FLOW CHARTS
SEND LAW & OPEN RESEARCH

Removing the SEND Tribunal, where most parents prevail, would cause more suffering: by Jane Harris Speech and Language UK

Imagine a world where schools and nurseries consistently spotted which children had special educational needs early. And staff knew how to support them. And specialists were available to give extra help.

This all sounds like a faraway dream for most parents of children with special educational needs. Despite the huge efforts of many people working in the system, families too often have to spend years trying to figure out what support their children need by themselves and trying to get someone – anyone – to recognise and help. They would switch their experiences for this utopia any day. 

Many sensible steps to get towards this hallowed place are to be found in the Local Government Association (LGA) and ISOS report released last week. Mandatory annual training for all teachers in special educational needs? Yes please. A curriculum that more children can engage with? Sign us up! Special schools able to offer support to mainstream schools to skill them up? When can they start?

Devil in the detail

But hidden in the report is one recommendation which is going to make terrified and vulnerable families feel even more powerless and even more fearful for their children’s futures. The report also recommends taking away families’ legal right to get extra support for their children and to challenge local councils when they don’t provide children with the extra support they need.

Despite working in SEND-related roles for almost a decade, as well as now being a SEND parent myself, I’ve yet to meet a family that’s enjoyed the process of getting a local council to agree to the support their child needs (via an Education, Health and Care Needs Assessment – EHCNA) or challenging a local council to provide more services (via a Tribunal application). It is clear to me that by the time they start either of these processes, families are usually utterly exhausted by the total lack of support they’ve been getting while waiting for their mainstream school to try in-class support for at least a year.

Meanwhile, their children are suffering at school, if they are going at all. One parent may have given up their job because of the amount of additional caring they’re having to do for their child. On top of all these pressures, they take on this bureaucratic and months- or years-long process, simply because no other route is getting their child the support they desperately need. And they are usually right – in 98.3% of Tribunal cases, judges find in the families’ favour.

Jane Harris
Jane Harris
Promoted

More tribunals, for good reason

It is true that more and more families are using these legal processes and the report sets out some reasons why that is happening: a genuine increase in need, national policy pushing mainstream schools away from inclusive practice, a lack of early intervention and a lack of training for teaching staff on special needs. In other words, more children need extra support, and the system isn’t set up to provide it.

These legal rights are the only way families can flag that existing support isn’t working and force councils to put things right. Let’s remember that if local councils don’t put in the right support, children, their families, and our economy and society all suffer. For example, without the right support, children with speech and language challenges are six to 11 times more likely to be behind at school, twice as likely to be unemployed as young adults, make up almost half of mental health service referrals, and two-thirds of the young offender population. Families are doing us all a huge favour by shouting when things aren’t working, giving councils and schools an opportunity to do the right thing.

“Imagine if we had a criminal justice system where 97% of appeals were upheld? Would anyone then think it was sensible to take away the right to appeal? Would that really fix the system, or would it just cover up miscarriages of justice and cause more suffering?”

Jane Harris, Speech and Language UK

It’s in the new government’s hands

Families will support and cheer on a Government that gets their children support quickly and early so they never have to turn to this kind of legal process. So they never have to spend precious hours filling in forms or spending many thousands of pounds on legal fees. But they cannot and never will support taking away a final safeguard in a system that is so broken.

Imagine if we had a criminal justice system where 97% of appeals were upheld? Would anyone then think it was sensible to take away the right to appeal? Would that really fix the system, or would it just cover up miscarriages of justice and cause more suffering?

We haven’t yet heard a full Government response to this report. Let’s hope that they are on the side of children and families and spend their time and effort on fixing services and getting support early to children, not on taking away the only safeguards that these children have.

Jane Harris, Chief Executive, Speech and Language UK

Books SNJ recommends
SNJ FLOW CHARTS

Also read:

Don’t miss a thing!

Don’t miss any posts from SNJ – simply add your email address below. You must click the link in the confirmation email you’ll receive to activate your free subscription.

You can also keep up with us by following our

Want more? Be an SNJ regular donor!

SNJ is a non-profit and everyone who writes here does so voluntarily. We need your support to help us with costs by donating once or as a regular patron. Find out more here

Special Needs Jungle
Follow SNJ

Discover more from Special Needs Jungle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

We LOVE to hear what you think... please take a minute to add your views here, so your comment is seen by all!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Special Needs Jungle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading