SEN Support: Poorer outcomes when needs aren’t thoroughly assessed

Last week I wrote about the problems facing parents of children in mainstream school whose special needs have been persistently overlooked. While the troubled roll-out of Education, Health & Care Plans has been extensively covered by Special Needs Jungle, little has been published anywhere about the outcomes for children and young people who have special needs but who do not have an EHCP. In other words, those who are supposed to receive “SEN Support” in their school or college.

SEN Support: Poorer outcomes when needs not thoroughly assessed

The SEND Code of Practice describes a special need in the same terms, whether the child or young person receives SEN Support or an EHCP:

6.15 A pupil has SEN where their learning difficulty or disability calls for special educational provision, namely provision different from or additional to that normally available to pupils of the same age.

Generally, the progress made by these pupils follows one or more of these patterns (s6.17):

  • is significantly slower than that of their peers starting from the same baseline
  • fails to match or better the child’s previous rate of progress
  • fails to close the attainment gap between the child and their peers
  • widens the attainment gap

But the reasons for placing a child or young person on SEN Support may also include (s6.18):

progress in areas other than attainment – for instance where a pupil needs to make additional progress with wider development or social needs in order to make a successful transition to adult life.

  • Autumn SEND Survey Click Here
  • buy the webinar
  • Become an SNJ Squad patron
  • College Plasdwbl

Upcoming insights

The next couple of weeks will provide real insights into the experience of children and young people entitled to SEN Support. On Thursday (22 June) the Department for Education will publish the school workforce data, allowing us to see whether the number of support staff fell last year. The following Thursday (29th June) they will publish the annual report on numbers of pupils with special needs.

The number recorded as being on SEN Support has been falling throughout this decade, while the number with a Statement/EHCP has been very stable. We can argue about the drop in SEN Support numbers – is it a sign of better practice in basic school provision or is it widespread denial of needs? Do schools accurately identify needs these days? As my piece last week showed, there is often inadequate assessment, monitoring and planning for them.

Compare the way in which children’s special needs are described (their “Primary Need”) between those on SEN Support and those with an Education, Health & Care Plan. The most common Primary Need at SEN Support is ‘Moderate Learning Difficulties’, a label which tells us (and teachers) nothing. Among those with an EHCP, however, this label drops to third most common, overtaken by Autism (the most common Primary Need among EHCPs) and Speech, Language & Communication Needs.

There is a simple explanation: when children labelled with Moderate Learning Difficulties at SEN Support are fully assessed for an EHCP, autism or language needs are often identified. This means that the intervention they receive while on SEN Support is frequently inappropriate or inadequate and parents realise the importance of getting a multi-disciplinary assessment.

Source: DfE SFR 20/2016 Schools, Pupils and their Characteristics
Source: DfE SFR 20/2016 Schools, Pupils and their Characteristics
Advertisements

SEN Support and Outcomes

What else do we know about outcomes for children and young people on SEN Support? The largest attainment gap in Key Stage 2 (Year 6) national assessment is between pupils with SEN and those without. Only 14% of pupils with SEN reach the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics, compared with 62% of those who do not have special needs. So children are more than four times as likely to reach national standards if they don’t have special needs.

That suggests that “Quality First Teaching” and targeted intervention need to improve an awful lot before children with special needs will be able to leave primary school with anything like the knowledge and skills of their peers. That data puts pupils on SEN Support and EHCP together, but we know that the vast majority of pupils with SEN entered for the national assessments are on SEN Support, not EHCP. The gap between these children and their peers is more than twice the gap between those who receive Free School Meals (FSM) and those who don’t. Socio-economic disadvantage is a factor in the inequalities of school life, but SEND is a much bigger factor.

We can also look at exclusions: pupils with SEND account for just over half of all permanent and fixed-term exclusions. Between SEN Support and EHCP, those on SEN Support have the highest exclusion rates and are over seven times more likely to be permanently excluded than their peers with no SEND.

No EHCP can have long term effects

How about their destinations after GCSEs? The latest data available shows pupils on SEN Support are less likely to continue in education (83%) compared with those who have a Statement (88%) and those with no SEND (92%). But pupils with special needs who do not have a Statement/EHCP are almost three times as likely to drop out of their post-16 destination as those with no special needs. They are more likely to give up on education and go into employment than others of their age.

So children who have special needs without the full assessment of an EHCP fall behind or out of education far more than their peers and far more than they should, even in a cash-strapped education system.

We need to do so much more. I have written to the Department for Education about it and I recognise that they have a number of new initiatives to address this. I look forward to reading the outcomes of the Whole-School SEND consortium which has now trained 300 people to review the quality of SEND support in schools.

But as I continue to help parents battling with a support system that refuses to be pinned down, that has no precise criteria, that has little legal status, that is anything the school wants it to be or nothing at all, I am seriously worried about children. I train teachers to support SEND better; last Friday a group of them worked with me from 1.30pm till 6pm in London and were still queueing up to ask questions. But they need a system that works: a system that is clearly-defined, that is consistent across schools and Trusts, that is transparent and accountable and that guarantees a trained SEND Co-ordinator will take responsibility for each child’s needs and for each parent’s concern AND WILL NOT LET THEM DOWN.

  • SNJ FLOW CHARTS
  • SEND Community Alliance Join us
  • Books SNJ recommends
  • Neurodiversity Celebration Week

Sources

Coming next...

On Thursday, we will have Barney's Key Points for SEN Support in Schools. It will be a post you won't want to miss and one you will definitely want to share!

Sign up for SNJ new post alerts

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Barney Angliss, @AspieDeLaZouch
Follow me
Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

6 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Planet Autism

Very interesting. Notice the focus of SEN support and EHCPs is academic levels but it doesn’t mention *reaching potential* or the fact that so many high-functioning autistic children don’t, even if they get by at at least average, that doesn’t mean they have reached their potential. Because so many are failing to cope, overwhelmed and riddled with severe anxiety and sensory issues that prevent them accessing their education on an equal footing with typical peers. So the SEN Code of Practice isn’t fully addressing the specific needs and rights of autistic children by the looks of it. Also notice the… Read more »

Christina Cramsie

In our L.A. they have half the amount of children listed as having ASD as areas of a similar size and cohort, and double the amount of children with speech language and communication needs. This was brought up in a meeting with various health proffs, one explanation was that as a borough we were very good at identifying SLACN’s!

Planet Autism

It’s very odd. There is definitely an agenda here I’m just not sure what. I just don’t think it’s down to confusion or ineptitude (and if it is, that’s even more evidence of how much autism training LA staff need!). You know how NHS doctors will address the symptoms so often without looking at the underlying cause (which in ASD is critical to diagnose). Well there is an issue with diagnoses being withheld on the NHS if they don’t believe the individual requires resources. I wonder whether there is something related going on within LAs, where they will just lump… Read more »

Matt Keer

This is unpleasant, but essential reading. Thank you for shedding more light on a part of the SEND system that doesn’t get the attention it should. Here’s a question for you: there are a lot of LAs out there who serve children & young people on SEN Support with a pseudo-EHCP – sometimes, they’re called ‘My Plan’ or ‘My SEN Support Plan’. LAs sometimes try to market these as having (almost) all of the assessment & provision benefits of an EHCP, plus extra flexibility… obviously downplaying the fact that these plans have no legal force. Is there any evidence out… Read more »