Just a quick post after Matt's epic blog yesterday on SEND Inspectors (we have been asked for a right of reply by Ofsted and are happy to do so, so watch this space).
The next tax year's SEND funding was announced yesterday, amounting to an increase of £4.2 million on last year to implement the reforms in England. It's the final year of funding support for implementation from the Department for Education and I do wonder if the amount of support that would be needed had been anticipated when the bill was being debated. If it had, they might have sought to make the SEND Code of Practice a lot tighter in prescription so local authorities had far less wriggle room. As it is, they've taken the gaps left for innovation and turned them into black holes of unlawful local policy, something foreseen by everyone except the DfE.
Scores on the doors
The funding for 2017-18 of almost £60 million breaks down as:
- £15 million for the Independent Supporters programme in 2017 to 2018, run by the Council for Disabled Children. The DfE describe this as a, "real driver of change for families navigating the SEND system and improving the experience for them." That, of course, is if you are told they exist by your case officer. And after this year, what then? Who will fund this 'real driver for change' so needed by parents?
- £2.3 million for Parent Carer Forums in 2017 to 2018, who bring parents together and provide a voice to influence local decision-making. A question was asked on Twitter yesterday about who inspects or is accountable for PCFs. I do know from my time as a PCF co-chair, that monitoring forms saying what they did with the money they received, do have to be submitted to Contact A Family who administer their grants and PCF activities are wide and varied around participation. It was mostly expenses as I recall to support outreach work across large county areas.
- £1.8 million to Contact a Family, to support individual Parent Carer Forums and their National Network, and to run a national helpline for families. And because someone has to pay the people who monitor the PCFs.
- This money also includes the funding for councils in England worth £40 million, spread out across the 152 councils. Every council's implementation cash has risen on the previous year.
Also read: Handsoff! SNJ learns new council funding to boost send implementation isn't ring-fenced
Also read: SEND charities and funding: Is there more trouble ahead?
The Education Minister, Ed Timpson, at the helm in these stormy seas of SEND, said:
As we enter the final year of the transition, I know there are still challenges to overcome, to ensure that the inspiring work going on in many parts of the country is shared with areas where improvements still need to be made.
That’s why I’m delighted to be able to confirm this additional funding for councils and for the groups playing such a vital role in supporting children with SEND. All children, no matter the obstacles they face, should have the same opportunities for success as any other.
Challenges.. I'll say. You only have to check back through the posts here to see that. However, it can't go on like this and we must, surely, sail into calmer waters soon. I still seem to be surrounded on all sides by angry parents and hapless local authorities in the same way - if not more so- than at the start of the changes.
A plea from the heart
I'll say it again - it's not even about money. This SEND ship won't safely dock until those managers in SEND, health and social care departments, who haven't yet drunk the reform Kool Aid, realise that they need to put children and families - NOT structures, policies and "the way we do things" - front and centre.
Heads up: Your way ain't working for anyone but you and you are not who the system is there to serve. You do the serving, okay? Public servant, the clue is in the job title. That's what you get paid for. It's not the council's money, it's the people's money, paid in taxes to protect the vulnerable (that's disabled kids and young people). Some of you are even sitting on surpluses. Make sure this money that's being handed over, unringfenced, goes where it should.
And to coin the 'Friends and Family' adage, make sure that the service you deliver is good enough for your child, or your grandchild, should they need it.
- How well is the Government respecting children with SEND’s right to education? - May 16, 2023
- SNJ in Conversation with Carrie Grant: Supporting children at the intersection of SEND, Race and Gender Identity - May 12, 2023
- SNJ WEBINAR: SEND Minister Claire Coutinho discusses the SEND Improvement Plan. Register now! - April 19, 2023
Yes, Hapless by name, Useless by nature. Our LA has just reissued my daughter’s EHCP claiming it to be ‘Updated’ following an annual review.
Sorry, I’m missing something here as: (a) an annual review did not take place, (b) an annual review cannot take place under the rules of natural justice as the original EHCP remains the subject of a FTT hearing (currently ‘stayed’ pending the outcome of an UT appeal by the LA against a FTT decision order for it to be issued (c) once again the same ‘mistakes’ (I can think of stronger words) are made i.e. SEP that trains and educates is not mentioned in the ‘Updated’ EHCP, let alone recognised as educational.
Somehow I can see (1) why my daughter was never sent a questionnaire by the DFE (ECHP was issued in 2015 so she should have been) and (2) why Ofsted were never pointed in our direction when they undertook their inspection.
Words fail me. How are YP ever going to receive the support they need to become independent adults when SEN staff have been trained by BS to strategically obstruct the whole process. And how are YP supposed to exercise their right of appeal when the legal process effectively prevents them from doing so: It’s nearly 6 months since the UT hearing took place.
Sorry, rant over. At least, with my daughter being the age she is, and having found a fantastic independent counsellor, we can see light at the end of the tunnel. But so many people can’t. And that’s what’s so very, very wrong. And unnecessary.