Leaks, denials, and fake conversations are no way to inspire parental confidence in Government SEND plans

What’s going on at the Department for Education? How can this be happening again? Even though we are all supposed to be in the middle of (checks notes) “the biggest national conversation about SEND in a generation”, it seems the only way national policymakers can share their intentions about a massive overhaul of SEND is via leaks from insiders to national newspapers (paywalled, read it free here), which the Government then distances itself from by saying:

“These claims are speculative and do not represent government policy proposals. We have launched the biggest national conversation on SEND in a generation, with plans being directly shaped by parents, the sector and experts who know the system best. That engagement will drive reforms that protect what families value and fix what isn’t working.”

Quote from the Times article, “Children ‘to lose right to Send support’ except in severe cases”

It prompted a second piece about the parent fightback, led by our campaign group, Save Our Children’s Rights.

We’ve been here before, unfortunately. In case it’s all a distant blur, here’s a quick recap:

Buy SNJ Ad
SEND LAW & OPEN RESEARCH
SNJ FLOW CHARTS

The 2025 Schools White Paper debacle

Last March, the Guardian and Schools Week reported that a white paper on SEND reform was imminent. The Government’s “strategic SEND adviser”, Dame Christine Lenehan, told journalists that they were considering restricting EHC plans to children in special schools.

Dame Christine, via her previous role with NCB charity’s Council for Disabled Children, was also strategic SEND adviser to the previous Conservative government, which brought us the 2022 green paper.

Her comments in May 2025 had several results: First and foremost, it created enormous anxiety among parents of children and young people with SEND, who have now spent months worrying that their child can’t rely on receiving the support they need to thrive at school.

Second, it rang alarm bells for Labour MPs who, having already faced the prospect of cuts to disability benefits, exercised their power to say “no, we’re not having this”. They seem disinclined to nod through cuts to support in education for disabled children.

The ensuing backlash led to our campaign to protect children and young people’s right to an education that meets their needs. It culminated in an overflowing debate in Parliament, with MPs from all parties vowing to provide the support children and young people need – putting the brakes on the Department for Education’s plans. The Education Secretary, Bridget Phillipson then announced that the schools white paper would be delayed. She told the House of Commons education select committee—which published a comprehensive inquiry report in September saying children and young people’s legal rights must be protected—that there would be “a further period of co-creation”. It’s not yet clear which of the inquiry’s recommendations will be taken up, if any.

The nightmare continues into 2026

Now, in the first week of 2026, we’re back to where we were last spring: newspaper reports of the right to statutory support in education being slashed, and parents’ anxiety raised to new heights. And all of this during the festive period, when no one can get any answers about anything. 

Whatever anyone may claim, this is NOT the fault of campaigners who have sounded the alarm about the implications for children and young people of calls for “SEND reform”. 

In the absence of a clear statement of the Government’s intentions, parents and professionals have had to piece together what might be coming down the track from claims such as:

  • Children and young people’s legal right to individualised support through a statutory Education, Health and Care (EHC) plan would, according to The Times, be scaled back for all but “the most severe and complex cases”.  No one seems to know how those cases would be defined, beyond a general sense that decision-makers will know one when they see it.
  • The threshold of eligibility for support would be raised, with ministers clinging to the hope that mainstream schools would become so inclusive, so well-attuned to understanding children’s special educational needs and how to meet them, that statutory support would be rendered unnecessary. But there is, so far, no commitment to investing in specialist teachers and therapists, only in buildings. 
  • Responsibility for decision-making would shift from local authorities to schools. 
  • And the route by which parents could challenge unlawful decisions about their child’s education? As clear as mud at this point.

Remember–these are from newspaper leaks; they are not official announcements.

A bumpy road ahead–if we act

This seems to be what ministers and their advisers want, but the path to get there hasn’t been as smooth as they expected (Parent campaigners, take a bow.)

They’ve realised, somewhat belatedly, that they need to talk to people at the sharp end: the families, teachers, therapists, and other professionals who support children and young people with SEND every day. In other words, those who have the best understanding of how the system works and what really needs to change.

Enter the national SEND conversation. Launched with fanfare in late November, with the white paper still due to be published early this year, the Government would like us to believe this is a genuine exercise in “co-creation”. Rather than, say, a bad-faith attempt to look consultative while all the major decisions about reform have already been taken and covertly briefed to the press. 

To parent representatives who try to persuade the rest of us that it’s an exciting opportunity for involvement: I have a very sparkly bridge to sell you. The Save Our Children’s Rights campaign is open to everyone who wants to tell legislators what they think the Government’s priorities should be for SEND reform. See further down for how to get involved.

Where are the schools’ voices?

And where are mainstream schools in all this? Do school leaders fully comprehend what might be coming their way? Are they ready to take responsibility for deciding, providing, and resourcing special educational provision for children with a wide range of special educational needs? The success of this Government’s SEND reforms will, it seems, stand or fall by how well mainstream schools, as a whole, can rise to this challenge. 

Without a solid framework of legal rights, children with SEND will be dependent solely on good intentions and at the mercy of local decisions. But reassurances can NEVER replace rights.

At this point, whether a schools’ white paper with detailed SEND proposals will be published this month, next month, sometime, or never, is anyone’s guess. While we wait for the next twist in this sorry tale of leaks, denials and promises, we will continue to do everything possible to help policymakers understand why the SEND system is in crisis and how it can be fixed. 

What do we want?

Like everyone else, we want the system for supporting children and young people with SEND to succeed. It’s self-evident that things cannot continue as they are, with children and young people routinely being failed and losing the opportunity of an education.

However, the approach to policymaking we are currently seeing, with public opinion tested through crude leaks to the media, serves no one. It lacks transparency and integrity, and puts intolerable strain on parents and schools alike. 

Much of what policymakers say they want to see in a reformed SEND system is already an integral part of the existing legal framework, were this to be fully and consistently implemented–including earlier intervention and more inclusive mainstream schools. 

The law needs to be protected and strengthened, and some aspects of the SEND Code of Practice 2015 need to be tightened and updated. Above all, the law needs to be implemented everywhere, for every child and young person who relies on it.

Promoted

What’s next from us?

Next week, on 12th January, representatives from our Save Our Children’s Rights team will hand in to Downing Street the petition to protect children and young people’s SEND rights that 132,789 of you signed. Don’t forget, that’s what kicked off the whole fight-back.

We will keep talking to MPs, and urge all of you to do the same.


Disabled Children’s Rights are Under Attack.
We’re fighting, but we can’t do it alone: we need your help more than ever.
We’re volunteer-run, but costs are rising. To help us keep going, please consider a one-off or, if it’s possible, a regular donation.
Read more about being a regular donor here.
We use Zeffy to fundraise, which doesn’t charge us a fee, so 100% of your donation reaches us.


Key Content

a monkey in the jungle with a magnifying glass and a deerstalker hat
image includes graphics from the article
SEND Politics
20 Rights at Risk

Also read:

Books SNJ recommends
SNJ FLOW CHARTS

Don’t miss a thing!

Don’t miss any posts from SNJ – simply add your email address below. You must click the link in the confirmation email you’ll receive to activate your free subscription.

You can also keep up with us by following our

Want more? Be an SNJ regular donor!

SNJ is a non-profit and everyone who writes here does so voluntarily. We need your support to help us with costs by donating once or as a regular patron. Find out more here

Catriona Moore
Follow me

Discover more from Special Needs Jungle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

We LOVE to hear what you think... please take a minute to add your views here, so your comment is seen by all!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Special Needs Jungle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading